Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Rudd's hospital reform more radical than 1984 Medicare revamp 

Rudd's hospital reform more radical than 1984 Medicare revamp

The Prime Minister's $30.9 billion overhaul to integrate Australia's health system goes much further than his simple pledge before the last election to "fix" the public hospitals.

Kevin Rudd is proposing steps to integrate the health system in radical changes, of a scale which transcends Australia's last big health revamp, Medicare, in 1984.

Not only is he proposing to radically change Australia's heavy dependency on hospitals, he is also planning to establish a new "independent umpire" at arms lengths from government, to set "efficient national prices" of health services to be paid for by federal and state governments.

The Rudd Government is seeking to REDUCE not increase use of public hospitals, thus easing the strain, by putting in place a more efficient, integrated arrangement which, it is hoped, will spur people to be treated by less expensive primary health, (ie outside hospital) services.

He is hoping to assuage the hostility of some states, particularly Victoria, to change by promising dollops more money for both hospital and primary care.

Rudd is promising to double the Commonwealth's contribution to efficient hospital services by promising to pay 60 per cent of the efficient running cost --- up from the 40 per cent level recommended by his own National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.

Canberra would also pay 100 per cent of the efficient price of primary health care services as part of a package he says will "permanently reverse" the decline in Commonwealth funding of public hospitals.

The federal Government will also directly fund "local hospital networks" (sounding familiar to the current Victorian arrangements) to "break down the barriers" in the system and deliver better integrated care.

These go much further than what was expected.

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, which delivered its report to the Government nine months ago, called for a shift towards a "one health system" to end the blame and cost-shifting inherent today. The commission urged the Federal Government to take over 100 per cent of the efficient cost of hospital outpatient services and pay 40 per cent of the efficient cost of every public patient admission to a public hospital, with that percentage figure to be increased incrementally to 100 per cent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size




comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Despite what is asserted above the Federal Government will NOT increase their share of the funding to the health system. What they will do is retain 30 of GST revenue, which by law must go to the States, and distribute this money as the Feds see fit - less the costs of growing the Federal Department of Health to handle the cash that they are by law required to give to the States untied to any specific grants. So the grand plan boils down to keeping money from the States and then returning it in tied grants, ie directly to parts of the State health systems that the Feds choose. So their is no guarantee that the retained 30% of NSW GST revenue will be retuned to NSW - more could be syphoned off to KRudd's home State. And people actually swallow this garbage from the spin doctos!
Posted by AlanL, 4/03/2010 11:43:19 AM
Okay, dodgy tradesmen wrecked the good the Government were doing in helping Australians to have their homes insulated and giving work to the honest tradesmen so Health is a different court whoever runs this system would no doubt would have to have high credentials to make it work. At the moment, highly paid Australians are rorting the health system by using public health and not declaring their private health fund. Most women in Griffith NSW are admitted as a public patient when they give birth at GBH. One said to me, "what is the point, the last time I was here I shared a room with another woman who did not have health insurance", so when she went for no 3 & 4 child she did not declare. We need an Australian Identity Card which would have our TFN, CRN & Health Fund Membership, so our Public Hospitals are not drained.
Posted by Eunice, 4/03/2010 1:27:08 PM
Where is Mark Baker and his model when we need it, Where ever you are mark thanks to you we still have a hospital and now rudd is copying. I was a nurse at the hospital and saw the months of work you did for us. I really worry what is going to happen to our regional hospitals with this plan
Posted by sharon, 5/03/2010 1:00:25 AM
Rome was not built in a day - Sounds like a good starting point, to get the nation a workable "Hospital/Medical" sytem for the 21st century.. Australia needs to work on a set of "Standard practices" in all government delivery of services and will reap the benifits in cost savings - without the loss of jobs and utilise staff to perform front line services - especially in hospitals.
Posted by Peewee, 5/03/2010 3:19:36 PM
Has anyone said there would be more money in the new Rudd health system? No. Has anyone said there would be fewer bureaucrats in the new Rudd health system? No. Has anyone said how much money would be saved and returned to taxpayers? No. This isn't a reform, it's a cop out. Mr Rudd promised he would take over. Now all he's doing is taking back funding fro he States - the 40/60 split will now be 60/40. He promised - he should deliver. That means lower costs for improved health services. No more blame game. If the States still have to stump up 40% you cn bet they'll cop it so the Feds can cop out. He should 'get with the program' and give all of us a 'fair shake of the sauce bottle' whe it comes to health. After all, it is our money.
Posted by Beast of Brisbane, 7/03/2010 12:43:58 AM
I might be inclined to think the federal governments proposed takeover of all our hospitals was a good idea if an election wasn't looming. Could this be another half baked scheme - very similar to the home insulation, planet saving one? Kevin Rudd has shown a real talent for spin - especially where he can get the phrase "for working families" into the script.
Posted by Full Montie, 7/03/2010 8:43:43 AM
Despite my being privately insured for `Top Hospital', I was still out of pocket to the tune of $1800 for a simple surgical procedure. When doctors refuse to operate on non-insured patients, there is no other option. Hence, I'm awaiting a National Health System which guarantees all patients prompt access to essential medical and surgical treatment in any hospital in Australia. Given Rudd's current poor track record, will this will be the case?
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 7/03/2010 2:25:04 PM
So why stuff around with 60%. By doing this the buck won't stop with you Mr Rudd because guess who won't take the blame when there is a fall at the hurdle. Get rid of ALL the double dipping if you want the glory BUT! stop this political merry-go-round masquerade and do it properly and be honest to the Australian people. Or next time when in scrubs put the big red nose on (and the hard hat)
Posted by Charlie, 7/03/2010 10:30:38 PM
Not sure that an extra layer of bureaucracy would make the health care system more efficent as some states are already struggling with a 3/2 ratio of bureaucrats to staff .
Posted by Waylander, 8/03/2010 11:31:07 AM
Sounds like a starting point to an election. Just another build up promise, that will be forgotten when its all over. Well at least he is off that stupid money grab he called Carbon trading. Now that was a money spinner.
Posted by Paulus, 8/03/2010 7:11:33 PM
1 | 2  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Kevin Rudd. Photo: Andrew Meares
Kevin Rudd. Photo: Andrew Meares
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles




Peninsula Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...